
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (9)
- March 2013 (8)
- February 2013 (8)
- January 2013 (9)
- December 2012 (7)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (9)
- September 2012 (6)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (8)
- June 2012 (8)
- May 2012 (14)
- April 2012 (14)
- March 2012 (17)
- February 2012 (21)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (15)
- November 2011 (12)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (9)
- July 2011 (15)
- June 2011 (19)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (10)
- February 2011 (9)
- January 2011 (9)
- December 2010 (7)
- November 2010 (9)
- October 2010 (10)
- September 2010 (11)
- August 2010 (11)
- July 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (23)
- May 2010 (8)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (9)
- February 2010 (8)
- January 2010 (8)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (8)
- October 2009 (7)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (8)
- July 2009 (10)
- June 2009 (11)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (3)
How To Botch Customer Service
Every social media and e-marketing “how-to” includes the admonition to respond to customer input promptly. Rightly so. Promptness is critical but so is the content of the response.
Perhaps that hasn’t been emphasized enough.
Consider it emphasized now.
A friend of mine sent an inquiry to the company that handles her prescriptions, asking a very specific question. She got a prompt, generic response that did not address her question although it did address the general area of her question: bill payment.
A second, somewhat snarky query by my friend yielded the correct response, signed “My goal is to ensure you are completely satisfied. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to meet my goal. Joe”
She replied with a thank you for the correct answer, to which she got another response, “My goal is to ensure you are completely satisfied. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to meet my goal. Sue”
The point? It’s clear that this is a canned script, not a real exchange. The email exchange was with multiple respondents using the same script, not a conversation between customer and service rep. It left the customer feeling ill-served, not well-served.
Yes, it’s not the end of the world. She got the answer she needed eventually.
But as we all know, a recorded message that “Your call is important to us” is not as satisfying as reaching a human being without being put on hold and reaching a human being is only satisfying if the person you reach is empowered to be human.
Compare that to the e-marketing practices of the Yes To! company. Who would you rather do business with?
Prompt and personal: Both must be part of your e-marketing.
How do you make customer service personal? Do you have an example of the right way to serve customers? Or examples of what not to do?

Blog by Email
Post new comment